The idea is good, as there is a "Skip button" that permit to personalize further the interface, or some settings in preferences were a "stock FC appearance" could be obtained. One thing that needs to be thought about: How will these changes impact the body of documentation and tutorial material that will now look different that what the wizard provides. If the wizard is not going to tackle some of the complaints about the default, to what extent is it limited to?Īs a starting point maybe we can agree what workbenches (and possible customizations of their toolbars) should be available for each of three levels.Īlso, maybe agree on toolbar layout, for each workbench, of common bars like File, Workbench, Navigation, Structure? ) to be somewhat comprehensive? For example each having a limited set of workbenches targeted at those tasks.Īre the configurations going to remain with the default color schemes and panel layouts? Only default toolbar (i.e.no customization and nothing added to the global toolbar). But I think some thought needs to be done with what the overall user experience should be.Īre the three levels (or more, maybe application specific, like Architecture, Electrical (i.e.
I think the idea of he "getting started" wizard is a good idea. I wanted to make some further comments.some thinking out loud as well.
0 kommentar(er)
